Web that loads fast and scales further

The modern web is a moving target. Frameworks shift, build tools rotate every six months, and yesterday's best practice is tomorrow's deprecation notice. Most agencies pick a stack, ship, and move on. We pick stacks designed to outlive the next refactor.

Praxvon builds with Next.js, React, and TypeScript by default — not because they're trendy, but because their ecosystem and longevity reduce risk. We also ship Vue and Nuxt when the customer's team is already invested in it. Either way, we pair the framework with rigorous performance budgets, accessibility from day one, and deployment pipelines that don't break on Friday afternoons.

Why Next.js as our default (and when it isn't)

We default to Next.js because the surrounding ecosystem — App Router, Server Components, the image and font pipeline, the deployment story on Vercel and self-hosted Node alike — has reached a point where the next two years of changes look incremental rather than disruptive. That matters when a B2B SaaS platform you ship today still has to be maintainable in 2028 with whatever team is on it then.

We've used Next.js across very different shapes. Moditra, a B2B modelist atelier platform, runs Next.js 15.1 with multi-role server actions, Server-Sent Events for real-time order updates, and a service-layer authorization model — see the architecture write-up in our blog post. AKS Otomasyon runs Next.js 16 with a programmatic SEO footprint covering 81 Turkish provinces and ten districts, with full hreflang and a 308-redirect mesh between locales — covered in this case study.

When Next.js is not the right answer: a content-heavy site with no interactivity beyond a contact form is better served by Astro or even a static MDX setup. A team that exclusively writes Python and Django doesn't suddenly benefit from a Next.js rewrite. Embedded widgets and dashboards inside an existing app don't need Next.js's full router. We try to recommend against work that doesn't actually need us.

What we measure, not what we promise

Performance gets discussed in pitches and then quietly missed in delivery. We hold ourselves to numbers that exist in production: mobile p75 LCP under 1.8 seconds on a slow 4G profile, sub-200ms TTFB from edge caches, Lighthouse Performance ≥ 90 on the canonical landing pages. Lower than that and we treat it as a regression, not a wish.

Lezzet Mutfağı, the restaurant brand we shipped in 2025, holds sub-1.2s mobile load and Lighthouse 100 across all four core categories — see the case study. On the AKS Otomasyon programmatic site, the median 81-city landing page renders in well under 500ms at the edge despite each page carrying climate-zone-specific schema and content blocks.

Performance is also a story about what you don't ship. We don't load tag managers on the critical render path. We don't lazy-import everything 'just in case' — code splitting that doesn't measurably reduce critical bundle weight is just complexity. We default to native HTML controls, accessible from the start, before reaching for component libraries.

How we work with existing codebases

Most of our larger engagements don't start with a blank Figma. They start with a team that has shipped something real and now needs senior eyes — on architecture, on a multi-month performance regression, on a migration the previous agency walked away from. We profile first and refactor incrementally. No big-bang rewrites unless the existing code is genuinely beyond rescue, which is rarer than you'd think.

Pages Router to App Router migration, Webpack to Turbopack, plain JS to TypeScript with strictness ratcheted up gradually — these are projects we've delivered without breaking a user-facing route. We scope them honestly: if a migration looks like six weeks of work that yields no user-visible value, we say so and recommend deferring.